Thursday, August 28, 2014

Windsor County Court July 22

Leon Jiggetts, DOB 8/30/87, pled not guilty to charges of obstructing justice, attempted 2nd degree murder, assault and robbery with injury, unlawful trespass into an occupied residence, and committing crime with weapons.  There are plenty of online articles with more information about these charges that you can access by googling Mr. Jiggetts.

Mandi Delancy, DOB 1/8/8, pled not guilty to six charges of welfare fraud between 2009-2012 in Proctor, Vermont

Sandy Jones, DOB 5/17/67, pled not guilty to careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle in Sharon on June 9

Brandin Durkee, DOB 4/6/88, pled not guilty to charges of careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle, eluding a law enforcement officer, operating a vehicle with a suspended license and violating conditions of release, in Sharon on June 6

You can read more about the charges against Durkee and Jones here:  http://www.ourherald.com/news/2014-06-12/Communities/Sharon_Mom_Is_Arrested_And_So_Is_Her_Son.html

In February, Durkee pled not guilty to charges of operating without owner consent and operating with a suspended license, in Hartford on February 2


Angela Redmond, DOB 12/21/72, pled not guilty to charges of possession of cocaine and violating conditions of release in Hartford on July 3.  In April, she also pled not guilty to a charge of possession of heroin.



Charles Bomhower, DOB 5/22/57, pled not guilty to a charge of his first DUI, in Hartford on July 3


Frances Phelps II, DOB 12/23/91, pled not guilty to a charge of possession of marijuana, in Hartford on June 18


David Marmor, DOB 3/5/43, pled not guilty to a charge of unlawful trespass on land, in Rochester on June 20


Jonas Ing, DOB 9/17/74, pled not guilty to careless or negligent operation of a motor vehicle in Weathersfield on May 27 


William Brooks, DOB 10/11/55, pled not guilty to a charge of unlawful trespass on land in Hartford on May 12 

 

Laryssa Benner, DOB 1/18/93, pled guilty to a charge of petit larceny in Hartford on May 27 


Tracy Kellar, DOB 4/21/69, pled guilty to a charge of unlawful trespass on land in Springfield on May 26


Aaron Fitzgerald, DOB 1/11/91, pled not guilty in January to giving false information to a police officer, and to a charge of his first DUI, in Ludlow on January 20.  In September of 2013, he also pled not guilty to charges of aggressive domestic assault and resisting arrest in Springfield in September of 2013.



 

 

 

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Windsor County Court July 15


The following individuals were charged with their first DUI:

 
Nathan Harwood, DOB 10/24/92 in Chester on July 5

Cody Root, DOB 9/6/92, in Weathersfield on July 4

Colby Martel, DOB 11/7/90, in Windsor on June 28

Sky Fogal, DOB 10/13/86, in Weathersfield on June 28

Peter Florucci, DOB 7/18/66 in Hartford on July 6



Michael Paquin, DOB 9/25/52 was charged with his second DUI in Windsor on June 26



Christopher Pierson, DOB 12/21/57, pled not guilty to a charge of driving with a suspended license, in Norwich on June 1



Clyde Brooks, DOB 5/23/67 pled not guilty to a charge of driving with a suspended license in Bethel on May 31

 

Kenvron Gardner, DOB 7/19/80, pled not guilty to charges of simple assault and disorderly conduct/fight, in Hartford on May 25



Russ Downing, DOB 8/30/69, pled not guilty to a charge of simple assault in Hartland on May 26



Brigette Eames, DOB 10/14/83, pled not guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct/fight in Hartford on May 15



Windsor County Crime Online:


Timothy Phelps and Charles Manby, in South Royalton on July 7: http://www.vermonttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/RH/20140731/NEWS02/707319897








 


 






Sunday, August 10, 2014

Nathan and Sarah's wedding - Cornish, 1794


Nathan Smith, a doctor and surgeon in Cornish in the late 1700's, married Jonathan Chase's daughter Elizabeth in 1791. Elizabeth was 26 and Nathan was 29. They had only been married for two years when Elizabeth died. After Elizabeth died, Nathan married her younger sister Sarah, who was called Sally. At the time of their marriage, Sally was 18 and Nathan was 32.

Many of the rules of American society changed after the Revolution, and the customs of courtship and marriage were no exception. Although marriages had ceased to be an economic negotiation between the fathers of two families, families still viewed marriage as a way to align the leading families of a town or county. It was common for sisters to marry brothers, and it was not uncommon for second cousins to marry. If a mother or father remarried after their original spouse had died, often the children would marry into the stepfather or stepmother's family. Prudence Chase married married a man named Nathaniel Hall, who was almost certainly related to her stepmother, whose maiden name was Hall.

The Chase's were the leading family in Cornish, and would have been happy to have their daughter marry a doctor. Although Nathan was a doctor, he was the son of a farmer from Chester, Vermont, and gained considerable social status by marrying a Chase. Fifty years earlier, the marriage would have been negotiated between the parents of bride and groom, or between the groom and the bride's parents, with little input from the bride. By the late 1700's, the bride had much more voice in the decisions surrounding her marriage, although exactly how much voice she had depended on the family.

Regardless, it wasn't a matter of falling in love with a boy and presenting him to her father as the man she wanted to marry. Girls saw boys at school or at church or at other social events, usually weddings or funerals. Girls and boys didn't “date” like they do now. There was very little privacy in small houses where there were lots of siblings and often an unmarried aunt or grandparent. Sometimes if a couple were interested in maybe getting married, the family would let them “bundle”. “Bundling” was a custom invented to give a couple some privacy in order to get to know each other better. Each young person was tied or sewn into their clothes, and maybe tied or bundled into sheets and blankets, and put into a bed together, then left alone in order to be able to visit in privacy. Sometimes the parents would put lay a board up on its side between them – called a bundling board.

We often imagine the families of young unmarried guys and girls during this era being very strict, not letting them out of the house unsupervised and guarding the morals of their young people very closely. Actually, in the late 18th century, one girl in three was pregnant when she was married, and the theory is that bundling had a lot to do with it. As long as girls were married by the time the baby came along, a premarital pregnancy wasn't the calamity it would be later in American history.

Obviously we don't know if Jonathan and Sally Chase allowed Elizabeth to “bundle” with Nathan Smith. We do know that neither Elizabeth nor Sarah was pregnant when they were married, although Sarah and Nathan's first child, a son, was born almost exactly nine months from their wedding day.

There is a story about Sarah and Nathan, that I have found in multiple sources. Apparently at Nathan's and Elizabeth's wedding, Sarah managed to get in between Elizabeth and Nathan for a few moments during the ceremony. One account portrays Sarah as a little girl, so I envisioned a four year old who had a crush on her future brother-in-law. No, Sarah was sixteen at Elizabeth and Nathan's wedding, so she may have had an eye on Nathan from the beginning. Keep in mind that wedding ceremonies were much simpler in those days. The bride and groom were married in the bride's parents' best room – the parlor if they had one, with close family members from both sides of the family in attendance. All attendees wore their best clothes, but not anything different from what they wore to church on Sunday. Afterward, there may or may not have been a big meal. Probably in Elizabeth and Nathan's case, there was, and probably there was a big meal for Sarah's wedding as well, although we don't know.

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Windsor County Court July 8


The following individuals pled not guilty to a charge of their first DUI:

Victor Hall, DOB 9/11/47, in Windsor on June 18

Travis Noble, DOB 4/24/92 in Royalton on June 28

Vikrum Thimmappa, DOB 9/27/87 in Hartford on June 20

Jessica Bobar, DOB 2/2/93, in Cavendish on June 13. Bobar also was charged with a DUI in Weathersfield on November 8



Kathleen Shattuck, DOB 5/4/86, pled guilty to a charge of her first DUI, in Springfield on June 27
 

Ryan Digiore, DOB 1/21/88, pled guilty to a charge of heroin possession in Hartford on April 18

Terry Coates, DOB 11/17/56, pled guilty to a charge of retail theft in Springfield on March 3

Juliane Bowens, DOB 7/13/79, pled guilty to a charge of retail theft in Springfield on March 13

Earl Grose, DOB 8/27/58, pled not guilty to a charge of possession of narcotics in Hartford on May 30

James Brockhart, DOB 4/21/45, pled not guilty to charges of his third DUI and operating a motor vehicle with a suspended license

Peter Shumway, DOB 6/5/82, pled not guilty to charges of eluding a law enforcement officer in Hartford on May 31

Rodney Stone, DOB 12/15/83, pled guilty to a charge of his 2nd DUI, in Springfield on June 27

Michael Lachapelle, DOB 9/23/56, pled guilty to a charge of careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle, in Weathersfield on April 26



Windsor County Court Cases Online:



Martin Gonyea, age 27, of Springfield-


John Johnston, age 33 and Ray Millard, age 36, of Springfield http://www.vermonttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/RH/20140610/NEWS02/706109989



Brandon Adams-Smith, age 16, and Alex Jillson Corbosiero, of Springfield http://www.vnews.com/news/12552151-95/teens-charged-with-roles-in-vt-shooting


Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Dr Nathan Smith, Surgeon, of Cornish


Jonathan Chase, Revolutionary War Colonel from Cornish, and first “founder” of the Cornish-Windsor Bridge, died in 1800 at age 68. His oldest daughter, Prudence, married Nathaniel Hall. Prudence was 8 years old when her mother, Thankful, died and Jonathan remarried Sarah Hall two years later. Although I researched Ancestry.com, I couldn't find proof that Nathaniel was related to Sarah, but I still think they were probably related. Nathaniel apparently was a huge man, weighing around 400 pounds, and Jonathan nicknamed his son-in-law “Tiny Nat”. Rauner Library at Dartmouth College has a picture of Prudence. It is copyrighted and I can't publish it here without permission. I don't really want to bother to get permission, so here is a link:http://libarchive.dartmouth.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/photofiles/id/26806/rec/1. Prudence and Nathaniel had 9 children. Six were born before Jonathan died.

Jonathan's next oldest daughter, Mary, married Ebenezer Brewster. Mary died in 1795 and did not have any children.

Jonathan's other daughter by Thankful Sherman also died young. Elizabeth married Dr Nathan Smith when she was 26 years old and died 2 years later. Elizabeth's sister Sarah, whose nickname was Sally, was 16 when Elizabeth and Nathan were married and 18 when Elizabeth died. Two years later, Nathan married Sally. He was 33 and she was 20.

Nathan Smith was a doctor who had an active practice in Cornish. He was raised in Chester, Vermont and had never had much formal schooling. He was educated enough to teach school, himself, though, and as a very young adult he taught school in Chester. One day he and a bunch of his friends heard that a man in their town was going to have his leg amputated. The group went to watch and Nathan ended up assisting with the operation. As he was helping the doctor clean up after the surgery, he mentioned to the doctor that he would like to study medicine. The doctor, Dr Josiah Goodhue of Putney, who had traveled to Chester specifically to perform this amputation, told Nathan that it wasn't enough to be able to read, write, and do arithmetic. In order to be a doctor, he would have to learn higher level mathematics and about science. Goodhue, a graduate of Harvard, recommended that Nathan enter the next Harvard freshman class.

There was no way that Nathan had the money to travel to Cambridge, Massachusetts to enter Harvard, nor did his family have the money to pay tuition. Nathan did the next best thing. He did a course of study with the Reverend Whiting of Rockingham, Vermont, studying Mathematics, Science and Latin. Whiting was also a Harvard graduate. Apparently that was enough for Doctor Goodhue, because when Nathan was 22 years old, and done studying with Reverend Whiting, he went back to Doctor Goodhue, knocked on his door, and asked again if he could study with him. Whiting accepted Nathan as a physician's assistant. This was a three year apprenticeship in which Dr. Goodhue offered Nathan a home and medical knowledge in return for his labor.

During this three year apprenticeship, Nathan's father died and his mother moved to Walpole, New Hampshire. After his apprenticeship ended and Nathan was ready to start his own medical practice, he chose to begin his professional life in Cornish. Probably the proximity to Walpole played a part in his decision, and it is also possible that he had some prior connections with the Chase family.


In the late 1700's, doctors earned about $500 a year, in currency and payment of kind. This is about the same pay as a skilled laborer would earn, and maybe a little less than the architects of the Cornish-Windsor bridge. In many communities, families used the services of the local midwife to treat the sick way more often than the doctor. Midwives had often completed more extensive training than doctors, although more informally, and had much more knowledge of natural and herbal remedies.

The biggest health problems in the late 18th and early 19th centuries were communicable diseases, the most deadly being tuberculosis. There were many serious childhood diseases, cholera infantum, scarlet fever (our common strep throat), and diptheria being the worst. Although tuberculosis was the number one killer of adults, adults also died of influenza, pleurisy and pneumonia. It was an era of heavy alcohol consumption, with plenty of alcohol related deaths, both from medical conditions caused by alcoholism and accidents that happened while people were drunk.

There was no real understanding of what caused disease, and certainly no understanding of bacteria and viruses. Many people believed that diseases and deaths from sickness were God's way of punishing people for not living a good enough life, or that they were God's way of testing their faith. Others believed that sickness was caused when the body was assaulted by poisons (called miasma effluvia) that were released into the air by decaying matter. This belief was based on the accurate observation that more people got sick during the hot, humid weather. Of course, many of the deadly germs were dormant during the cold winter months, but the cold brought dangers of its own. People did notice the phenomenon of contagion, and theorized that there were invisible poisons in the air, called “animalculi”, which was probably the most accurate of the many theories.

Another theory was that the human body was adversely affected by temperature, and sickness was caused by weather that was too hot or too cold. This was prevalent even in my childhood, when my mother bundled us up before sending us outside if it was even a little cold, believing that if we got “chilled” we would be sick. We were also cautioned about playing too hard on a hot day in case we got “overheated”. People studied the positions of the stars and the moon in the sky, and many blamed an outbreak of influenza or other deadly diseases on the way the stars were aligned. The appearance of a lunar or solar eclipse, or a comet, could cause a panic.

Medical doctors really know how to treat or cure many of the diseases that caused people to get sick and die. Most medical practice revolved around the belief that sickness involved an imbalance of fluids in the body, and most doctors in that era treated disease by trying to restore the balance of fluid, often by bloodletting. Nathan Smith, however, was a surgeon. Surgeons actually could help people. They could remove tumors, do amputations (which may not sound very helpful, but usually saved a person's life), set broken bones, and perform trephination, when they drill a hole the head of a person who has suffered a head injury to relieve pressure and prevent permanent brain damage or death. Skilled surgeons could even remove cataracts from eyes and diseased internal organs, such as an appendix. Keep in mind that any surgery was performed without anesthesia. The most popular and renowned surgeons were noted for their speed in performing operations, because quick operations lessened the time patients had to spend experiencing the excruciating pain.

After Nathan had practiced medicine for two years in Cornish he decided he needed real, formal medical training. To that end, he belatedly took Dr. Goodhue's advice and registered at Harvard. When Nathan was a medical student, instruction took place by lecture only. There was no laboratory instruction and certainly no lessons using a real human body, either dead or alive. Nathan graduated from Harvard with a Bachelor's Degree in Medicine. He did his dissertation on the circulation of blood, which is a commonplace topic in 2014, but in those days knowledge about the circulation of blood was cutting edge. The only formal education Nathan experienced up until then was his time at Harvard.

After he graduated from Harvard, he returned to Cornish and resumed his medical practice. By this time he was in his early thirties and it was time to settle down, get married and start a family. The Chases were the leading family in Cornish, and Nathan married Jonathan's daughter Elizabeth. Elizabeth only lived for two years after the marriage. A year or so after she died, Nathan married Jonathan's next youngest daughter Sarah, who was nicknamed Sally.

Dr. Nathan Smith's medical saddlebag


Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Windsor County Court June 10


Andrew Cleland, DOB 5/23/79, pleaded not guilty to charges of aggravated cruelty to animals, undue pain to animals, cruelty to animals and depriving animals, in Woodstock on January 3.


Michael King, DOB 4/2/82, pleaded not guilty to a charge of false pretenses or false tokens, in Hartford on April 14.

Andrew Lohman, DOB 8/29/92, pleaded not guilty to a charge of possession of a narcotic, in Hartford on April 16

Anthony Saienni, DOB 5/19/69, pleaded not guilty to a charge of operating a vehicle with a suspended license in Cavendish on March 31

Michael Downer, DOB 1/15/70, pleaded not guilty to a charge of operating a vehicle with a suspended license in Hartford on April 15

Susan Baldwin, DOB 11/23/72, pleaded not guilty to a charge of operating a vehicle with a suspended license, in Cavendish on May 3

Bryan Souliere, DOB 6/12/75, pleaded not guilty to a charge of his third DUI, in Chester on July 15

Sandra Holt,, DOB 8/25/63 pleaded not guilty to charges of unlawful trespass into an occupied residence, and larceny greater than $900 in Chester on May 22

Wesley Wing, DOB 1/31/78, pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct, in Springfield on April 16

Yvette White, DOB 3/16/69, pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct/obstruct, in Hartford on April 29

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Toll or No Toll - Cornish - Windsor Covered Bridge


At the beginning of the 20th century, people on both sides of the Cornish-Windsor bridge initiated another campaign to make passage over the bridge free of charge. The proposed plan was to have both towns share the responsibility for the maintenance of the bridge. In 1926, Richard Turner Dana, an engineer specializing in construction, wrote a book entitled “The Bridge at Windsor, Vermont and Its Economic Implications”. The proprietors of the bridge at the time hired him to do an inspection of the bridge, and to do what would probably now be called a feasibility study in regards to dissolving the proprietorship or maintaining the private ownership of the bridge, and thus the toll.

Dana starts the book by giving a history of the bridge starting with the ferry owned by Jonathan Chase. Chase initiated the proprietorship and the building of a bridge because the river was often unnavigable by ferry. In the winter it became solid ice, in the spring the floods made it impossible to cross and summer droughts sometimes made it too shallow. A bridge would create a crossing in all types of weather.

In those days, all roads led to the seacoast. Portsmouth was the hub of economic activity in New Hampshire, but Boston, not all that far away from Portsmouth, was New England's primary city. Businessmen often traveled to Portsmouth on business. Farmers drove herds of cattle and sheep to Portsmouth, either to sell on the hoof to become meat on the tables of families in the cities, or to meat processors who slaughtered the animals, salted the meat and shipped it to the Caribbean islands.

Windsor was the premier city in Vermont in the late 18th and early 19th century, and was a focal point for commerce headed east, toward the seacoast and away from Vermont. Windsor was the last outpost of civilization before the wilderness of the Vermont frontier began. In 1790, the population of Windsor was 1542 people. One hundred years later, the town had grown to 2,175 people. In 2000, Windsor had a population of 3,756. Cornish, on the other hand, was much smaller. In 1790 it had a population of 982 and one hundred years later the population had grown to 1156. Cornish in 2000 had a population of 1,640.

During Vermont's agricultural heyday, there was heavy traffic over the bridge. To give an example, on Monday October 24, 1825, 838 sheep and 259 cattle crossed the bridge. On the heaviest day ever, more than a thousand sheep crossed on their way to market on the seacoast. Almost all the traffic on the bridge came from points north and west. Stagecoaches also used the bridge in their routes from Vermont to New Hampshire. Dana mentions Skinner's Stage, Pette's Stage, and the Concord and Lebanon Stages. Apparently the stagecoaches operated from 1825 to 1836. Probably prior to 1825, there weren't enough people in Vermont to merit a stagecoach route, and after 1836, the railroads took the place of the stagecoach as transportation.

Dana writes that in some years, the bridge operated at a loss, which occurred when the expenses of repair and maintenance exceeded revenue. During those years, the proprietors applied to the New Hampshire legislature for a toll increase. The same thing happens today when electric companies, phone companies, and the post office apply for a rate hike. In fact, Dana points out that toll roads and toll bridges were the oldest public utilities.

He explains why so many New England bridges were covered. In other parts of the United States, bridges are made of stone, but in New England, lumber was so plentiful that bridges were made of wood instead of stone. The Cornish -Windsor bridge was built of “clear cedar”. The roofs over the bridges made them last ten times longer than if they were uncovered.

The present bridge was built in 1866, after several earlier models were washed away in floods. The 1866 version was exactly like its predecessor, but built higher up, hopefully out of the way of flood water. In 1912, it was thoroughly examined by engineers for the first time since it was built, and showed no signs of deterioration in the wood. The wood was actually bored in 18 places to make sure it wasn't rotting from the inside out, and every spot was negative for any damage or rot.

Dana says that by the present (meaning 1926), the vast majority of the traffic over the bridge was automobiles. He claims that automobiles cause less vibration on the floor of the bridge than horses hooves – (remember, he's talking about Model T's, not heavy pickups or dumptrucks) and certainly the floor is cleaner. It never occurred to me that all of that livestock and the horses that went over the bridge daily would have left a lot of manure behind, and the fact that the bridge was covered meant that the rain didn't wash it away and the sun didn't dry it out. Probably the proprietors had to hire someone to clean it up.

Dana examines both sides of the great toll debate. He says that people who use the service should pay for it. People who travel over the bridge pay the toll. The guy, like the blacksmith, who almost never leaves his town should not have to pay extra taxes for a service he never uses. The toll system automatically works this way.

He does bring up an issue that I've never thought of, but is still relevant today. Voters tend to vote in favor of a building project during good economic times. This means that when the project is built, labor and materials are both expensive. Then during an economic downturn, citizens are stuck having to pay for an expensive project when money is tight. Dana says it makes more sense to vote in favor of a building project when economic times are bad. Labor is cheaper, materials are expensive, the project will provide jobs, and the citizens will pay less over time. In about five years, he was going to have ample opportunity to test that theory, during the Great Depression.

Dana doesn't solve the debate, however. The bridge was taken over by the state of Vermont during the Great Depression. Hopefully I will make it to the New Hampshire History Library in Manchester to find out why the proprietors finally gave it up. Probably traffic over the bridge slowed to a trickle in the 1930's, both of a result of the terrible economy and the loss of population in Vermont.

The toll wasn't finally abolished until 1943.