Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Windsor County Court, July 9


Nicholas Dimitriov, DOB 5/28/63 pled not guilty to a charge of operating with a suspended license in Hartford on June 27



Jamie MacDonald, DOB 10/20/85, pled not guilty to charges of disorderly conduct/noise, and violating conditions of release in Hartford on May 22. These charges stemmed from a disturbance at the Super 8 Motel. McDonald also had prior charges of his second DUI, unlawful tresspass on land, violating conditions of release, and resisting arrest, in Woodstock on February 16



Elizabeth Thurston, DOB 2/8/87, pled guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct/noise in Hartford on May 22



Terri Stephens, DOB 4/15/70, pled not guilty to charges of her 4th DUI, and operating with a suspended license in Royalton on June 30



Gunnar Lunde, DOB 5/25/89, pled not guilty to a charge of heroin trafficking in Windsor on May 5



Bryan Fish, DOB 7/23/65, was charged with his first DUI, in Sharon on June 15


In addition, I have been meaning to include links to two court cases that have information available on other websites but never made it here, due to the timing of the arraignments.

Paul Braden III was charged with aggravated domestic assault and unlawful mischief.  You can read about it here:
http://wntk.com/wp_news/2013/05/31/weatherfield-vt-man-charged-with-aggravated-domestic-assault-and-unlawful-mischie/

Leann Salls, a correctional office at the Springfield Correctional Center, is allegedly pregnant with an inmate's child.  You can read about it here:

http://www.vermonttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/RH/20130606/NEWS02/706069918


Charles Aikens, Blacksmith


In 1860, the federal census says that Charles and Jane Aikens live in Enfield, New Hampshire, with Elijah and Indiannah Shattuck. Charles is 27 years old and Jane is 21. Charles' occupation is listed as blacksmith, and Elijah Shattuck is listed as a “home maker”. I believe this is actually a builder of homes, and not a housewife. The man above Elijah on the census is also listed as a “homemaker”. I did a little further research on Elijah Shattuck and on any other census, he is listed as a wheelwright. My guess is that Charles was apprenticed to Elijah Shattuck, either formally or informally, to learn the blacksmith trade. It's more likely that he was an assistant to Elijah rather than truly an apprentice, because I don't think apprentices were married.

At the time of their marriage in 1857, Jane was 16 and Charles was 24. They were married in Royalton. When Charles enlisted in the Union Army, he and Jane had been married for 5 years. Although he was listed as living in Enfield, New Hampshire in 1860, at the time of his first enlistment, in 1862, he was credited to the town of Barnard, Vermont. After the war, he returned to Barnard and was a blacksmith there until he became old.

When I found that Charles Aikens was a blacksmith, I knew I should do some research on blacksmithing, which I knew nothing about. I knew blacksmiths used fire, worked in a shop, and pounded metal on anvils. I vaguely knew what an anvil was because it was what Wile E Coyote threw out of windows to squash the Roadrunner, on Saturday morning cartoons when I was a kid. I knew that the post Civil War era was one of huge changes in the life of a blacksmith.

One thing that didn't change much over the course of centuries was the blacksmith shop itself. The blacksmith shop was a building that was about the size of a large garage. The central feature of the shop was the forge. The forge was an elevated brick platform, a hearth, really, that was covered by a metal hood that opened into the chimney. This was where the fire pit was. The blacksmith controlled the fire by adding fuel or letting the fire burn down, by adding air, or by arranging the fuel into different shapes, to create a long, thin area of fire or a more square area of fire.

There was a metal pipe that entered the fire pit at the bottom of the forge. This pipe was called a tuyere. A bellows forced air into the pipe. The bellows (pictured at right) was a huge pleated leather bag with a nozzle at one end. When the handle of the bellows was pumped, the bellows pushed air through the tuyere into the fire pit, making the fire hotter.

When the fire in the forge was the appropriate temperature, the blacksmith heated a piece of wrought iron to a blood red heat, then smoothed it into the shape he wanted by setting it on the anvil and hammering it. If he heated it to a white heat, he could shape it over the anvil's horn, thin it (draw it) or thicken it (upset it). At the highest heat, a sparkling welding heat of 2400ยบ, he could weld two pieces of iron together, or add a piece of steel onto the iron, to make a cutting edge for a tool. Later in the 19th century, blacksmiths worked more and more with steel, as it became more available and iron was less available. Charles Aikens probably worked with both iron and steel.

Anvils were the “work table” of the blacksmith. They were usually made out of cast iron and mounted on a block of hardwood. Anvils could be plain or elaborate. Some had holes to hold different tools, and some had a built-in nail header. The blacksmith had a collection of hand tools, the most important being hammers, tongs, punches and files, most of which he made himself.



A blacksmith's anvil

Tubs of water and various other solutions were used throughout the smithing process. Rapidly cooling the hot metal made it really hard. Then when the smith reheated it to just the right temperature, it wouldn't be so hard that it was brittle, and would be a tough,
long-lasting tool. Blacksmiths used water for cooling the hot metal items they made, but for tempering they used various solutions, including milk and water, sealing wax, water and ice, salt water, mercury, and oils like linseed, neatsfoot, flaxseed, fish oil, tallow, lard or sperm oil. They also used chemical solutions made of various recipes of water, saltpeter, citric acid, and alum.

In the 18th century, nails were made by blacksmiths. Often a beginning blacksmith's apprentice would start learning the trade by making nails. To make a nail, the blacksmith would heat a square iron rod, and then hammer all four sides to a make a pointed end, then reheat the pointed rod and cut it off.
Then he would insert the hot nail into a hole in a nail header (pictured at left) or an anvil with a nail header and hammer it a few times to form a head. By the early 1800's, blacksmiths who specialized in making nails were developing machines to make nails, and by the early 20th century, nails were made of steel rather than iron and were all mass produced.

The Gazetteer and Business Directory of Windsor County Vermont 1883-1884 lists Charles Aikens as a general blacksmith. A general blacksmith made metal into whatever their customers wanted. Charles could have made plows, harrows, shovels, axes, hoes, scissors, skate blades, water pumps, hinges, carpenter's tools, knives, scythes, sickles, skewers, tongs, various types of chains, parts for wagons, and household items like spoons, ladles and spatulas. By the 1870's, most blacksmiths were no longer making either nails or horseshoes, which were mass produced They did put horseshoes on horses, and make custom horseshoes for horses with defective hooves or orthopedic problems, tasks that would eventually become part of a farrier's job. If Charles had a specialty, it was probably as a wheelwright, since he had worked for a man who called himself a wheelwright rather than a blacksmith. Jeanette Lasansky, in her book To Draw, Upset and Weld, says that, “The last specialties maintained within a general smith's repertoire were wheelwrighting and horseshoeing.”

In the 18th century, young men who wanted to become blacksmiths were apprenticed to an experienced blacksmith with a good reputation. Most experienced blacksmiths who had prosperous businesses had at least one apprentice. After the Civil War, apprenticeships weren't as common. However, in 1880, when Charles was 48, the census lists an apprentice, 22 year old Frank Adams, as part of the Aikens household.

It's impossible not to wonder about Charles and the changing role of the blacksmith in the rural economy of post Civil War Vermont. Did he have enough work to earn a living, or was increased mass production of nails, horseshoes and household and craft tools causing a slackening of business? There are several reasons to believe that he had enough business. First of all, the fact that he had an apprentice as late as 1880 leads one to believe that he had enough work to keep two people busy, and a good enough reputation to interest a young man in learning the trade with him.

The 1883 Windsor County Business Directory lists a dealer in hardware, iron and steel, and agricultural implements; and a dealer in agricultural implements in Andover. I believe these were the new mass produced items that Charles would have been making in his blacksmith shop. Andover also had a blacksmith. Barnard had two blacksmiths, including Charles, and a man who was listed as a blacksmith, carriage repairer and farmer. Bethel had a man who was listed as a blacksmith, dealer in hard and soft wood, and farmer; a hardware dealer, a steelworker, a blacksmith who specialized in horseshoeing, a general blacksmith and horseshoer, and a blacksmith. Many of the businessmen listed had several types of businesses at once. Even the farmers were often listed as sugar makers, and having apple orchards as well as dairy cows and/or sheep. The fact that Charles was listed as just a blacksmith tells us that his business was good enough to support a family without a side job or another type of business. On the other hand, there was a full page ad in the directory for Robbins and Marsh of Chester Depot, selling Hardware, Iron and Steel, Carriage Trimmings, Cutlery, Carpenter's Tools, and Barbed Steel Ribbon Fencing. Although Charles had enough work to make a living as a blacksmith, certainly the new hardware stores would take some of his customers.


A picture of the Aikens blacksmith shop, taken from the book
"Barnard, A Look Back" published by the Barnard Historical
Society in 1982. The shop is the building to the left of the big
oak tree.



Blacksmiths were constantly working in metal, fixing old tools and fabricating new ones, often inventing new implements to fulfill a certain need for a customer. The blacksmith shop retains a special place in the American psyche, as Lasansky says, “A place where the fire roared, the sparks flew, and the smith seemed almost god-like as he made hard iron become pliable and respond to his direction by using his eye, mind and hand in a series of controlled steps. It was where tools for businesses, homes and farms were forged, even occasional weapons, and where many means of transportation were both made and repaired.”

Blacksmiths entered American culture in other ways. Not only was John Deere a blacksmith, he was a blacksmith from Vermont, from Rutland, who went out west and invented the steel plow, and started the John Deere company we all know today. John Froelich, a blacksmith from Iowa, invented the tractor. The term “too many irons in the fire” refers to someone who has so much going on he can't tend to it all, like a blacksmith who has too many irons in the fire, and can't properly work with them all.

One thing I wondered is whether Frank Adams, Charles' apprentice in 1880, stayed with the blacksmith profession, in view of the increase in mass produced metal tools. In 1900, Frank was 41 years old and living in Lebanon. Not only is he listed as a blacksmith, but there is a 22 year old living with the Adams family with the last name of Smith. In the census his relationship to the head of the family is listed as “servant” but his occupation is listed as “blacksmith”. He is an apprentice. Unfortunately, Frank died 7 years later, at age 49.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Windsor County Court, June 25


Marie Townes DOB 3/17/84 pled not guilty to a charge of giving false information to a police officer on April 29 in Springfield. She also pled not guilty to a charge of aiding in the commission of a felony in Springfield in February. This charge involved aiding someone who was selling heroin. Townes also pled not guilty to a charge of simple assault on May 2.



Francis Phelps. DOB 12/23/91, pled not guilty to a charge of possession of cocaine in Hartford on April 29.



Sean Lyman, DOB 9/21/90 pled not guilty to a charge of unlawful mischief in Hartford on may 2



Amanda Tarajkowski, DOB 7/9/90, pled not guilty to a charge of giving false information to a police officer in Springfield on April 29.



Michael Descoteaux, DOB 8/11/76 pled guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct/fight in Spring field on January 8



Jeremy Potwin pled guilty to a charge of driving with excessive speed in Bethel on April 26



Michael Downer, DOB 1/15/70 pled not guilty to a charge of driving with a suspended license in Hartford on May 19



Daniel Forbush, DOB 10/21/87 pled not guilty to a charge of DUI in Sharon on June 16



David Thar, DOB 2/12/91, pled guilty to a charge of careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle in Stockbridge on June 20



Levi Striker, DOB 10/12/88 pled guilty to a charge of reckless or gross negligence in operation of a motor vehicle in Royalton on June 15



William Stable, DOB 7/31/70 pled not guilty to a charge of violating an abuse prevention order in Hartford on May 15



Michael Morris, DOB 11/12/68 pled guilty to a charge of possession of marijuana in Hartford on May

24



Matthew Branch, DOB 4/5/83, was charged with operating a motor vehicle with reckless or gross negligence, operating to elude, operating without owner consent, DUI, and operating with a suspended license.



Patricia Wilson, DOB 7/8/70, pled not guilty to a charge of her first DUI, in Windsor on June 18




Windsor County Court, June 18


James Lacomb, DOB 8/20/80, pled guilty to a charge of operating with a suspended license in Springfield on May 22



Joshua Crowson, DOB 3/8/91, pled guilty to a charge of possession of less than two ounces of marijuana in Springfield on May 22



Christopher Plunkard, DOB 11/17/75, pled guilty to a charge of driving with a suspended license in Cavendish on May 4



Amanda Spicer, DOB 7/11/89, was charged with driving with a suspended license in Hartford on May 4



Kyle Ritchie, DOB 9/12/89, pled not guilty to a charge of aiding in the commission of a felony in Andover on June 28, 2012



Jeffrey Horton, DOB 1/17/66, pled not guilty to a charge of unlawful mischief in Springfield on April 10



Natasha Morse, DOB 9/24/90 pled not guilty to a charge of retail theft in Windsor on April 9



Donna Le May, DOB 4/30/63, pled not guilty to a charge of driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or both in Windsor on April 10



Daniel Race, DOB 1/6/82, was charged with petit larceny and giving false information to a police officer in Hartford on May 7. This charge involved money stolen from a wallet at a Hartford Advance Transit stop.



Jonathan Van Alstyne, DOB 7/12/92, pled guilty to charges of his first DUI, careless or negligent operation of a motor vehicle, and attempting to elude a police officer in Ludlow on June 9



Carson Mashler, DOB 11/15/87, pled not guilty to two counts of domestic assault in Sharon on June 15



Derek Noble, DOB 8/18/82, pled guilty to a charge of possession of a depressant, stimulant, or narcotic on May 13 in Sharon



Dale Adams, DOB 8/25/65, pled not guilty to charges of disorderly conduct/fight and disorderly conduct/language in Hartford on April 27



Sharon Michaud, DOB 12/11/89 pled not guilty to a charge of burglary in Springfield on April 14



Geoffrey Gilman, DOB 3/2/70, pled not guilty to charges of his first DUI, and disorderly conduct/fight in Bethel on June 7



Shane Branch, DOB 5/31/79, pled not guilty to charges of violating an abuse prevention order and domestic assault, in Springfield on February 14



Vermont 3rd Light Artillery Brigade at Petersburg


In August of 1863, Charles Aikens of Barnard Vermont was reunified with his wife Jane after having served in the Union Army as a Nine Month volunteer. During his enlistment, he had traveled from Barnard to Washington, DC and then into enemy territory in northern Virginia. Just before his term of service expired, his regiment, the 16th Vermont, embarked on a forced march through Northern Virginia and Maryland, toward the battlefields of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Arriving home almost immediately after having fought in the battle of Gettysburg, Charles spent a few months in Vermont, then reenlisted in the army. He reenlisted in December of 1863, and was mustered into the 3rd Vermont Light Artillery Unit on January 1, 1864.

Charles' second journey south took the same route his first trip had, down the Connecticut River Valley by train, through New York City, Philadelphia and into Washington, DC, where he stayed in an encampment for a few weeks before going deeper into Confederate territory. The 3rd Vermont Light Artillery went further south than the 16th did, though, all the way to Petersburg, Virginia. Petersburg is 129 miles further south than Fairfax, where the 16th was stationed.

Petersburg was a city of 18,000 people. It was a supply base and railroad depot for the whole Richmond, Virginia area. Five railroads operated through a junction in Petersburg, which made the city vitally important to Richmond, the capitol of the Confederacy. If Union forces could occupy Petersburg and eliminate it as a supply center for Richmond, Richmond would be indefensible, and Lee's army would have to abandon its capitol. Beginning in the Spring of 1864, Grant's army spent nine long months wearing down the Confederate defenses of Petersburg, in what became known as the Siege of Petersburg, or the Petersburg/Richmond campaign.

Petersburg was heavily defended. The Confederates knew that Richmond depended on open transportation routes through Petersburg, and had dug trenches all around the city as early as 1862. Trench warfare, to become infamous in World War I, was introduced to military history at Petersburg. By 1865, there were 53 miles of trenches around Petersburg.

The Petersburg Campaign was part of a new strategy of General Grant's. Before this, the goal was to defeat Lee in an open battle. This had failed time and time again, with huge casualties, and Grant really wanted to end the war, so he decided to switch gears. The Petersburg Campaign is often called the “Siege of Petersburg”, but it wasn't really a siege in the traditional sense of the term. The Union army didn't surround Petersburg and starve the people out. Rather, they attempted to starve Richmond by cutting off the transportation lines to Richmond that originated in Petersburg.

At the beginning of the Petersburg Campaign, 20,000 Confederate troops were trying to hold off 67,000 Union attackers. It is hard to know exactly how many combatants were there at any given time. Over the course of 9 months, there troops moved in and out and both sides' armies were in a constant state of movement. It is safe to make the general statement that the Confederates were consistently outnumbered and the Federals were consistently better supplied. In addition, many of the Confederate soldiers were either very young, very old, or had already been wounded in another, earlier battle. It is a credit to the tenacity and bravery of the Confederate soldiers that they were able to hold off the Union army for an incredible nine months.

Beginning on June 15, 1864,the Union army began a direct assault on Petersburg. 42,000 Confederate troops held off 62,000 Federal troops, due to the powerful defensive earthworks and trenches all around the city. On the first day, the Union almost succeeded in capturing the city. At least one Confederate regiment and battery surrendered before darkness began to fall. Rather than continue in the dark, Commanding General William Smith decided to quit fighting and continue the assault in the morning. The Confederates regrouped in the night, and it took the Union 291 days more to accomplish what they could have done on that first day. That first battle, which really accomplished nothing in that the Confederate side did not get rid of the Union attackers, and the Union attackers did not capture the city, resulted in 11,000 casualties. After the first failed assaults on the city, the Union left lines of artillery and soldiers in place to harass the entrenched Confederate defenders. Charles Aikens and the rest of the Vermont 3rd Light Infantry Battery arrived at Petersburg on June 18th, and set up shop on the artillery line there.

In late June, the Union focused mostly on capturing railheads and destroying the railroads around Petersburg. Fierce fighting ensued as Confederate troops rushed in to defend these positions. On June 23, the First Vermont had succeeded in tearing up half a mile of railroad track when they were attacked and overwhelmed by Confederate forces. Many of them were taken prisoner. The Union troops succeeded at disabling several of the railroads. They didn't have any decisively successful battles, but they did enough to make the situation just that much more difficult for the increasingly overstretched Confederacy.

Meanwhile, Aiken and his batterymates were in the relative safety of the artillery line directing fire at the Petersburg trenches. Their Commander, Captain Romeo Start, in the “Vermont Artillery Third Battery Unit History” tells that the unit received their “baptism of fire” after it crossed the James River at Wilcox Landing on June 17th, on the way to Petersburg. He says that, “from June 20 to July 30 the battery was almost daily and nightly engaged in artillery duels with the enemy's batteries, so that during that period it was almost one constant artillery engagement.”

The Union was still frustrated that although they had made some headway in shutting down the railroad lines, they still hadn't accomplished much in their main objective of capturing Richmond. They came up with a creative new plan. They would tunnel underneath the Confederate lines, plant explosives beneath one of the Confederate forts and blow it up, then use the opening to attack the Confederates from the rear.

At first, the plan was to have a troop of Black soldiers be the first to attack after the explosion . This troop was trained and drilled on the procedures they would use as the first men in. At the last minute, the Union commanders changed their mind and used white soldiers instead, fearing political reprisals if the attack failed. What would be known as “The Battle of the Crater” went down on July 30. The explosion created a crater 170 feet long, 70 feet wide and 30 feet deep. The explosion itself killed between 250 and 350 Confederate soldiers.

You would think that, having done this much damage inside the Confederate lines, the Union would have had it made, but no. First off, the Union soldiers were so stunned by the huge explosion they wasted precious moments before embarking on their assault. Secondly, the black soldiers had been trained over and over again to go around the crater. The newly chosen division went into the crater, becoming sitting ducks for the Confederate defenders, who obviously surrounded the crater and fired into it from above, slaughtering the attackers. To make matters worse, in another unbelievable development, Union reinforcements also went down into the Crater. The Battle of the Crater was a resounding defeat for the Union, with a loss of 4,000 men compared to Confederate losses of 1500. Captain Start describes the role of the 3rd Vermont Light Artillery in the battle. “On the 30th of July, 1864, when the great mine explosion took place in front of Petersburg, the battery was occupying Fort Morton directly opposite the mine and the enemy's redoubts which were blown up by its explosion. The battery was hotly engaged with the enemy's artillery from 3:50 a.m. until 10:30 a.m., during which time three hundred and ninety-five shot and shell were thrown upon the enemy's columns, which were within easy range. The battery, being protected by the heavy embankments of the forts, suffered no serious loss.” The 17th Vermont regiment did go down into the Crater, however, and suffered about 40 killed, taken prisoner, and wounded, including all 8 of its officers. General Ambrose Burnside resigned from the army, after General Grant put him on “extended leave” as a result of the disaster at the Battle of the Crater.

After the Battle of the Crater, starting in August, battles raged over control of the railroads and roads leading from Petersburg to Richmond. From August 30 to September 6, the Vermont 3rd Light Infantry Battery occupied Fort Sedgewick, also known as “Fort Hell” because it was the nearest fort to enemy lines and thus received the worst fire from rebel artillery. Captain Start mentions “Fort Hell” in his history, saying, “From August 30 to the 6th of September, 1864, the battery occupied the hottest place on the entire line before and around Petersburg, known to the artillery as "Fort Hell." Eugene Rolfe, a member of the Vermont 3rd Light from Tunbridge, described “Fort Hell” in his diary. “It is a 19 gun fort and is a complete line of fire with mortar and rifle shells bursting in and around it. Getting our pieces into position we are soon at work and in the excitement loose all fear. Along the whole length of our line there is a continuous roar of musketry and artillery with at times thirty or more great mortar shells in the air at the same instant and in spite of the danger there is a strange liking of the life one leads here where one lives years in a single night.” (You can read Eugene's whole diary at the Artillery Reserve Organization website: http://www.artilleryreserve.org/main/rolfe.pdf )

                                        Fort Hell

The Union won some of these battles and the Confederacy won some, but by February of 1865, the Union had finally managed to shut down most of the supply lines to Richmond, after both sides suffered huge numbers of casualties.

By March, General Lee knew he had to attack the Union forces outside Petersburg. His army was weakened by disease, desertion and a shortage of supplies. Generals Sheridan and Sherman were headed toward Virginia, and the Confederate forces would be no match for their armies combined with Grant's. On March 25, Lee ordered an attack on Fort Stedman, a spot that he thought was weakest in the Union's lines.

With the element of surprise, at first the Confederate attack seemed to be succeeding, but the Union commanders realized what was happening and sent reinforcements in to bolster Union strength, then ordered an artillery barrage, turning the tide of the battle. The Battle of Fort Stedman was a Union victory. The Union lost 1,000 men and the Confederates lost 3,000 and could not replace them. This latest loss decimated an army that had been trickling away for the prior 9 months.

On April 2, Grant again led the Army of the Potomac in a direct attack on Petersburg. In “The Final Battles of the Petersburg Campaign: Breaking the Backbone of the Confederacy”, A. Wilson Greene describes the moments before the battle began. “Captain Romeo H Start of the 3rd Vermont Battery, stationed at Fort Fischer, received the fateful directive. His signal gun would launch 14 thousand troops toward Rebel embankments a few hundred yards distant in the misty darkness,

fortifications one Federal soldier called 'the strongest line of works ever constructed in America'. Moments later a now anonymous Vermonter pulled the lanyard on his gun and a solitary boom echoed across the clammy gloom.”

As the Union forces attacked the defensive trenches around Petersburg after the signal from the Vermont 3rd Light Artillery, the first brigade into the trenches was the 5th Vermont, led by Captain Charles Gould from Windham Vermont, who was wounded multiple times in hand to hand combat, but fought on.
Gould received the Medal of Honor for his bravery that day. Twenty minutes after the signal shot was fired, the Confederate line was broken and the rebels began deserting the trenches in retreat. Lee withdrew his army from Petersburg and Union forces entered the city. Lee also withdrew his forces from Richmond, and by the morning of Monday, April 3, the American flag was flying above government offices in the former Confederate Capitol.

Although Lee was down, he did not believe he was out just yet. He is quoted as saying that by holding on to Richmond, the Union has dictated strategy, but the loss of Richmond allowed him to do whatever he wanted, and he would dictate strategy from then on. Maybe so, but he surrendered to General Grant at Appomattox Courthouse one week later. Two months after Lee's surrender, in Brattleboro, on June 15, 1865, Charles Aikens was mustered out of the United States Army for the last time.